Thompsons Solicitors - link to homepage
Call Us 08000 224 224
Google Search
Internet Thompsons Solicitors







You are in: Home Page | About Thompsons | Publications | LELR Issue 52
Dot separator
Issue 52 (November 2000)

Contents

grey bullet marking index itemSexuality discrimination: unlawful
grey bullet marking index itemNational Minimum Wage becomes less minimal
grey bullet marking index itemHuman Rights seminar
grey bullet marking index itemPolice employers liable for bullying
grey bullet marking index itemDoctors on call
grey bullet marking index itemSnooping on staff is still suspect
grey bullet marking index itemThe hidden penalties of leaving work

National Minimum Wage becomes less minimal

National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (Amendment) Regulations 2000
Smith v Thomas (Employment Tribunal, 1100367/2000,unreported)

The National Minimum Wage regulations came into force on 1 October and raised the rate of the national minimum wage from £3.60 to £3.70 per hour.

The regulations also introduce a number of other changes:

red bullet indicating list item workers on National Traineeships and their equivalents in Scotland and Northern Ireland are now treated as having contracts of apprenticeship for the purpose of the national minimum wage;
red bullet indicating list item post-graduate students who do work experience for up to one year as a requirement of their course will not have to be paid the national minimum wage for that work, provided that the course is at a UK higher education institution;
red bullet indicating list item time when a worker is permitted to sleep can only be excluded from the calculation of the national minimum wage if the worker is provided with suitable facilities for sleeeping.

The regulations also introduce technical amendments relating to travel time between assignments, being "on call" at home and the submission of time sheets.

Meanwhile an Employment tribunal has ruled on the definition of a "rest break" under the National Minimum Wage regulations. In Smith v G and M Thomas, a tribunal had to consider whether a nightcarer's breaks during an 11 hour shift counted for the national minimum wage. Regulation 15(7) provides that the period of a "rest break" does not count towards time worked. Could the Applicant count the full 11 hours towards her time worked? Although the tribunal refused to believe that she never "nodded off" during her shift, there was no proper provision for her to have a rest break during her shift.

The tribunal saw no problem in transporting the definition of a "rest break" contained in the Working Time Regulations into the National Minimun Wage Regulations as a minimum standard. The rest break must have a clear start and end point, be uninterrupted and be for at least twenty minutes. Applying the reverse burden of proof built into the national minimum wage regulations, the respondents were unable to convince the Tribunal that Ms Smith enjoyed the benefit of rest breaks. The entire 11 hours therefore counted towards her time worked and she was not being paid the national minimum wage.

We are here to help,
please telephone us on
08000 224 224

[24 hours]
© Thompsons Solicitors 2008.
A firm regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
All rights reserved.
Important Information about using the Thompsons website.